Loading field map
The concept of entrepreneurial ecosystems emerged in the early 2000s as a response to the limitations of earlier frameworks that focused on individual entrepreneurs or isolated firm-level factors. Precursors include regional innovation systems, industrial clusters (e.g., Porter's diamond model), and the work of AnnaLee Saxenian on Silicon Valley's network-based advantages. These earlier approaches highlighted the importance of geographic concentration and institutional support, but they did not fully capture the dynamic, interdependent nature of the environment that enables entrepreneurial activity. The ecosystem lens shifted attention from the entrepreneur as a lone hero to the systemic conditions—such as culture, policy, finance, and human capital—that collectively foster new venture creation and growth.
The term "entrepreneurial ecosystem" gained traction through practitioner-oriented works like Daniel Isenberg's 2010 Harvard Business Review article and Brad Feld's 2012 book "Startup Communities." Isenberg proposed a framework of six domains: policy, finance, culture, supports, human capital, and markets. Feld emphasized the role of bottom-up, inclusive networks led by entrepreneurs themselves. These early frameworks were prescriptive and aimed at policymakers and community builders, offering checklists and principles for fostering vibrant startup hubs. They popularized the idea that ecosystems are self-sustaining when key elements are aligned, but they lacked rigorous theoretical grounding and empirical testing.
Academic development accelerated in the mid-2010s with efforts to formalize the concept. Erik Stam (2015) defined entrepreneurial ecosystems as "a set of interdependent actors and factors coordinated in such a way that they enable productive entrepreneurship." He proposed a systemic framework with ten elements, including formal institutions, culture, networks, and demand. Ben Spigel (2017) introduced a relational perspective, distinguishing between cultural, social, and material attributes and emphasizing how they interact. Measurement frameworks also emerged, such as the Global Entrepreneurship Index (GEDI) and the OECD's Entrepreneurial Ecosystem Scorecard, which sought to operationalize the concept for cross-national comparison. These developments moved the field from metaphor to a testable theoretical construct.
More recently, scholars have critiqued the ecosystem concept for being overly optimistic, static, and biased toward high-growth technology startups. Critical entrepreneurship studies have questioned the assumption that ecosystems universally benefit all regions and entrepreneurs, highlighting issues of inequality, exclusion, and the reproduction of power structures. The field has also engaged with sustainability, linking entrepreneurial ecosystems to grand challenges and the circular economy. Despite these critiques, the ecosystem framework remains a dominant lens in entrepreneurship research and policy, with ongoing efforts to refine its boundaries, dynamics, and applicability across diverse contexts.