Loading field map
The academic study of how new ventures come into being was long dominated by the Psychological Traits School. This paradigm sought to explain venture creation through the stable characteristics of the individual entrepreneur, such as need for achievement, risk propensity, and internal locus of control. It positioned the entrepreneur as a central, predisposed actor, making the formation of a new venture a function of personal disposition. This perspective established the foundational question of "who the entrepreneur is" but faced criticism for its deterministic view and limited predictive power.
A significant shift occurred with the rise of the Process School, which reframed venture creation as a sequence of behaviors and events rather than a personal attribute. This school introduced stage models, emphasizing the activities an individual or team undertakes to bring a venture to life, from opportunity recognition and resource mobilization to legal establishment and early growth. It moved the focus from static traits to dynamic, manageable actions, making entrepreneurship a learnable and researchable process of organizing. This became the central, enduring paradigm for understanding the internal genesis of new ventures.
Concurrently, the Environmental School emerged, challenging the agency-heavy focus of the process view by emphasizing external determinants. This paradigm examines how venture creation is shaped by factors outside the entrepreneur's immediate control, including industry dynamics, resource availability in entrepreneurial ecosystems, and the structuring forces of institutional voids or supports. It answers how macro and meso-level conditions enable or constrain the rate and nature of new venture formation, offering a more contextualized, structural explanation.
In recent decades, distinct methodological traditions have crystallized within the process-oriented core. Effectuation has emerged as a major framework, positing that entrepreneurs in situations of true uncertainty start with given means (who they are, what they know, whom they know) and co-create the future through commitments and alliances, rather than executing pre-selected plans. It represents a logic of control contrasted with predictive, causal models. Similarly, Bricolage has been canonized as a framework explaining venture creation under resource constraints, where entrepreneurs improvise by making do with resources at hand, recombining them for new purposes.
Today, the subfield's understanding is synthesized across these coexisting families. The Process School remains the central spine for modeling venture creation activities, now enriched by specific logics like Effectuation and Bricolage. This core is fundamentally contextualized by the insights of the Environmental School, which explains the embeddedness of the process. The earliest Psychological Traits perspective persists primarily in integrated models considering founder characteristics as one input into the broader process, completing a multi-level view of venture creation.