Loading field map
The field of Information Science (IS) emerged in the mid-20th century from a confluence of practical concerns in documentation, library science, and the nascent computer sciences. Its central historical question has been the nature of the relationship between data, information, knowledge, and human systems, framed by the problem of organizing and retrieving recorded knowledge efficiently. The subfield's evolution is characterized by a series of overlapping paradigms and methodological shifts, from a focus on physical documents and systems to a concern with human cognition and, later, socio-technical contexts.
The foundational phase, often labeled the Physical Paradigm or the Documentalist Tradition, was dominant from the 1940s through the 1960s. Rooted in the work of pioneers like Vannevar Bush, Suzanne Briet, and the early activities of the American Society for Information Science, this approach treated information as a tangible entity contained in documents. The core problems were bibliographic control, classification (e.g., the Dewey Decimal System, Universal Decimal Classification), and the development of indexing and abstracting services. Methodology was largely engineering-oriented, seeking to optimize storage and retrieval systems, with the Cranfield experiments in the 1960s epitomizing the rigorous, system-centric evaluation of retrieval performance. This period established the core canon of IS as a technical discipline concerned with information transfer systems.
A significant transition began in the 1970s with the rise of the Cognitive Paradigm, also known as the Cognitive View. Reacting against the mechanistic limitations of the Physical Paradigm, scholars like Brian C. Brookes, Bertram C. Brookes, and later, Nicholas J. Belkin (with his Anomalous State of Knowledge concept), shifted focus to the user's mental states and cognitive processes. Information was re-conceptualized as something that altered an individual's knowledge structure. This "turn to the user" emphasized human information behavior, relevance judgments, and user-centered system design. This paradigm drew heavily on cognitive psychology and established user studies and experimental methods as central to IS research, framing information retrieval as a fundamentally cognitive communication process.
By the late 1980s and 1990s, a new set of critiques coalesced into what is broadly termed the Socio-Cognitive Paradigm and the more radical Domain-Analytic Approach. Associated with scholars like Birger Hjørland, the Domain-Analytic Approach argued that information and knowledge are socially constituted within specific discourse communities or domains (e.g., law, medicine). Meaning and relevance are not purely individual cognitive constructs but are shaped by the epistemic traditions, literature, and practices of a field. This approach integrated historical and hermeneutic methods, emphasizing the study of scholarly communication, bibliometrics, and the sociology of knowledge. It represented a clear methodological disagreement with the individualist focus of the pure Cognitive Paradigm.
Concurrently, and often in tension with the cognitive and domain-analytic schools, emerged the Social Paradigm or Practice-based Approach. Influenced by social constructivism and theories from sociology (e.g., Anthony Giddens's structuration theory), this perspective, advanced by Elfreda Chatman and others, examines information behavior as embedded in everyday life contexts and social norms. Chatman's concepts of "information poverty" and "life in the round" highlighted how social worldviews and situational relevance, rather than just intellectual need, govern information seeking and use. This tradition often employs ethnographic and qualitative methods to understand information practices within specific social groups.
The contemporary landscape is characterized by a pluralistic and often critical engagement with these established paradigms. The advent of the digital age has intensified questions about information organization (e.g., ontologies, folksonomies), access, and policy. Modern interpretive schools have explicitly applied critical theory lenses. Critical Information Studies, influenced by Marxist Criticism and political economy, examines power structures, commodification, and labor within information systems. Feminist Criticism in IS critiques gendered assumptions in technology design and information practices. Furthermore, Postcolonial Criticism informs analyses of global digital divides and the hegemony of Western knowledge organization systems. While not replacing the core canonical paradigms, these critical schools represent a significant late-wave expansion of the field's methodological and philosophical scope, applying established humanities historiographical schools directly to information phenomena.
Thus, the history of Information Science reveals a trajectory from system-centric engineering, through cognitive psychology, to socially and critically informed perspectives. The central tension between positivist, humanist, and critical approaches continues to define its research landscape, as it grapples with the fundamental questions of what information is and how it functions in an increasingly complex and networked world.