Research Radarcs.CVJul 13, 2026classified

Beyond the Single Camera: Agentic Multi-View Reasoning in Sports Video Understanding

Kerui Chen, Jinglu Wang, Xiaoyi Zhang, Yan LuarXivPDF
cs.CV

Paper Guide Brief

Reading Brief

This paper introduces SportMV-Bench, the first benchmark for multi-view sports video understanding, and proposes SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that iteratively selects informative views, invokes perception tools, and accumulates evidence to improve multi-view reasoning in MLLMs.

Central Claim

SportMV-Bench (787 multi-view video bundles, 2592 QA pairs) and SportMV-Agent (agentic framework with active view selection, perception tools, and evidence-grounded reasoning).

Contribution

SportMV-Bench (787 multi-view video bundles, 2592 QA pairs) and SportMV-Agent (agentic framework with active view selection, perception tools, and evidence-grounded reasoning).

Why It Matters

It is the first benchmark to evaluate MLLMs on multi-view sports video understanding, revealing that the primary bottleneck is fine-grained visual perception and view selection rather than reasoning or domain knowledge, and proposes an age...

Prerequisites

multi-view reasoning, agentic framework, active view selection, perception tools, evidence-grounded reasoning

Atlas Placement

Computer Vision (subfield)

Read If

You care about multi-view reasoning, agentic framework, active view selection.

Skip If

You only care about SportMV-Bench, Perception-Aware Recognition (PAR).

Methods
multi-view reasoningagentic frameworkactive view selectionperception toolsevidence-grounded reasoningiterative loop
Tasks
multi-view sports video understandingquestion answeringaction recognitioncontact detectionadjudicative decision reasoning
Datasets
SportMV-BenchNBA official replay archiveSoccerNet
Benchmarks
SportMV-BenchPerception-Aware Recognition (PAR)Rule-aware Event Interpretation (REI)Adjudicative Decision Reasoning (ADR)

Noosaga Placements

  • Computer Visionsubfield95%
    The paper focuses on multi-view video understanding, a core computer vision task, and introduces a benchmark and method for evaluating MLLMs on sports videos.
    We introduce SportMV-Bench, the first multi-view benchmark designed to evaluate MLLMs on multi-view sports video understanding.We propose SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that orchestrates an iterative loop of active view selection, perception tool execution, and evidence-grounded reasoning.
  • Vision Transformers and Foundation Modelsframework90%
    The paper evaluates and builds upon Vision Transformers and Foundation Models (MLLMs) as baselines and components of the proposed agentic framework.
    Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on single-view video understanding benchmarks.We evaluate a broad set of state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary MLLMs under this protocol.
  • Active Visionframework85%
    The proposed SportMV-Agent actively selects informative views, which is a form of active vision, to overcome occlusion and gather evidence.
    SportMV-Agent actively decides which view to examine, invokes specialized perception tools to extract concrete evidence, and iteratively accumulates findings until sufficient confidence is reached.Active view selection is critical.
  • Deep Learningsubfield80%
    The paper evaluates and builds upon Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs), which are deep learning models, and uses them as baselines and components.
    Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on single-view video understanding benchmarks.We evaluate a broad set of state-of-the-art open-source and proprietary MLLMs under this protocol.
  • Vision-Language Modelsframework70%
    The paper uses Vision-Language Models (MLLMs) as the core technology for video understanding and QA, and the proposed method builds upon them.
    Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on single-view video understanding benchmarks.We propose SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that orchestrates an iterative loop of active view selection, perception tool execution, and evidence-grounded reasoning.
  • The paper uses LLMs for QA generation and verification, and the task involves natural language questions and answers, but the core focus is on video understanding.
    We feed it to an LLM and instruct it to simulate a referee certification exam setter.We employ a strong MLLM (GPT-5) as an auditor.
  • The proposed SportMV-Agent uses an agentic framework with an orchestrator and tools, which aligns with multi-agent systems concepts, but the paper does not focus on multi-agent coordination or communication.
    We propose SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that orchestrates an iterative loop of active view selection, perception tool execution, and evidence-grounded reasoning.

Abstract

Recent Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) achieve strong performance on single-view video understanding benchmarks. However, sports videos involve dense occlusion, rapid motion, and complex interactions that are difficult to resolve from a single viewpoint. In practice, sports events are recorded from multiple camera angles, providing complementary evidence used by referees. Yet, no existing benchmark evaluates MLLMs on multi-view sports video understanding. To address this gap, we introduce SportMV-Bench, a comprehensive benchmark built from official match recordings, through a dedicated pipeline combining LLM-based generation, MLLM-based verification, and human filtering to ensure quality and consistency. SportMV-Bench containing 787 multi-view video bundles and 2592 question-answer pairs across three categories: Perception-Aware Recognition (PAR), Rule-aware Event Interpretation (REI), and Adjudicative Decision Reasoning(ADR). Our analysis shows that current MLLMs fail to effectively exploit multi-view information, with the bottlenecks lying in fine-grained visual perception and view selection rather than logical reasoning or domain knowledge. We propose SportMV-Agent, an agentic framework that orchestrates an iterative loop of active view selection, perception tool execution, and evidence-grounded reasoning, achieving a significant 14.46% relative improvement over the strongest MLLM baseline.

Paper Context

Source ContextWhole paper
Budget100,000 tokens
Coverage59,625 chars

Classified from the full extracted paper text (59,625 characters). The Paper Guide brief above is the user-facing synthesis; raw context is kept out of the page.

Full-paper context sent 59,625 of 59,625 extracted characters to classification.

Beyond the Single Camera: Agentic Multi-View Reasoning in Sports Video Understanding | Research Radar