Sophistication in GenAI Use: Field Evidence from a Large Firm
Paper Guide Brief
Reading Brief
This paper studies how sophistication in generative AI (genAI) use varies among the back-office workforce of a large firm, using proprietary data of 713,564 employee prompts and corresponding LLM responses from nearly 4,000 employees across 15 functional areas over eight months in 2025. The authors find that senior employees exhibit more sophisticated genAI use, sophistication varies across functions (highest in Strategy, Digital Innovation, and Project Management), and neither time nor formal AI training improves sophistication. The study provides measures and insights into sophisticated genAI use for managers and researchers.
Central Claim
The paper provides field evidence on how sophistication in generative AI use varies among employees in a large firm, introducing measures of genAI sophistication based on LLM-classified conversation transcripts and linking them to employee seniority, functional area, and training.
Contribution
The paper provides field evidence on how sophistication in generative AI use varies among employees in a large firm, introducing measures of genAI sophistication based on LLM-classified conversation transcripts and linking them to employee seniority, functional area, and training.
Why It Matters
This is the first large-scale field study to measure and analyze the sophistication of generative AI use among employees using proprietary conversation-level data, revealing that domain expertise complements genAI capabilities and that sop...
Prerequisites
Background in Artificial Intelligence.
Atlas Placement
Artificial Intelligence (subfield)
Read If
You care about Artificial Intelligence.
Skip If
You only care about a different atlas route.
Noosaga Placements
- The paper studies generative AI use in a workplace setting, focusing on how employees interact with LLMs, which is a core topic in artificial intelligence.We study how sophistication in generative AI (genAI) use varies among the back-office workforce of a large firm.Using proprietary data, we observe 713,564 employee prompts and their corresponding large language model responses.
- Neural NLPframework80%The study uses LLMs (neural NLP models) to analyze employee conversations and measure sophistication.To measure genAI sophistication, we prompt an LLM to classify each conversation by use case and assess the clarity and specificity of its instructions and the prompting techniques employed.
- The study uses LLMs to classify employee conversations and assess prompting techniques, which are central to NLP applications.To measure genAI sophistication, we prompt an LLM to classify each conversation by use case and assess the clarity and specificity of its instructions and the prompting techniques employed.The paper includes detailed metaprompts for LLM conversation analysis.
- Attention Mechanisms and Transformersframework50%The LLMs used for classification are based on transformer architectures, though the paper does not focus on the underlying model architecture.an enterprise-specific chat tool that provided access to commercial large language models (LLMs) such as those from Anthropic and OpenAI.
- The study uses LLMs for classification, which is a machine learning application, but the focus is on empirical analysis of usage rather than developing new ML methods.We prompt an LLM to classify each conversation by use case and assess the clarity and specificity of its instructions.
Abstract
We study how sophistication in generative AI (genAI) use varies among the back-office workforce of a large firm. Using proprietary data, we observe 713,564 employee prompts and their corresponding large language model responses from nearly 4,000 back-office employees across 15 functional areas over eight months in 2025. We document three main findings. First, senior employees exhibit more sophisticated genAI use, consistent with domain expertise complementing genAI capabilities. Second, sophistication varies considerably across functions and is highest in Strategy, Digital Innovation, and Project Management, three groups that share a focus on firmwide strategic initiatives and organizational change. Third, we observe neither improvements in sophistication over time nor lasting improvements following formal AI training, suggesting that sophisticated use can be difficult to change. Together, our study provides measures of and insights into sophisticated genAI use that managers can use to improve outcomes and that researchers can use in future research.
Paper Context
Classified from the full extracted paper text (120,649 characters). The Paper Guide brief above is the user-facing synthesis; raw context is kept out of the page.
Full-paper context sent 120,649 of 120,649 extracted characters to classification.